Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Question about Adaptive Mesh Refinement - COMSOL

Posted 19 juil. 2011, 05:43 UTC−4 Mesh Version 4.2 2 Replies

Itxaso
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi,

I am trying to simulate a point heat source that follows a spiral path in 2D. I want to have a fine mesh around the heat source (where thermal gradients are more marked), but coarser in the rest of the model.
If I define the Error Indicator as "sqrt(Tx^2+Ty^2)", the refinement works well, but then (when the source moves away and the thermal gradients are not so marked), the mesh doesn't recover its original element size. It remains being fine.

What can I do to return to a coarse mesh in areas distant to the source, once it has moved away? I attach the .mph model.

Thanks in advance,

Itxaso

Attachments:

2 Replies Last Post 3 nov. 2011, 21:58 UTC−4
COMSOL Moderator

Hello Itxaso

Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.

If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.

Clinton Canaday
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 3 nov. 2011, 13:23 UTC−4
I would also like to know if it is possible to do this through the GUI. I don't see why it would be difficult to implement programmatically, either. Coarsen if error is below a certain threshold and refine if it is above...keeping error in a band of tolerance.
I would also like to know if it is possible to do this through the GUI. I don't see why it would be difficult to implement programmatically, either. Coarsen if error is below a certain threshold and refine if it is above...keeping error in a band of tolerance.
Vincent Zhang
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 3 nov. 2011, 21:58 UTC−4
Hi Itxaso:

I have computed your model. But the result is different from yours. Refinement works well. The mesh of heated area become coarse again.

NDF also fluctuated.

Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 4089.
Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 4072.
Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3476.
Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 2822.
Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3176.
Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3344.
Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3164.
Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3358.
Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3417.
Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3188.


I work on 4.2.0.228
Hi Itxaso: I have computed your model. But the result is different from yours. Refinement works well. The mesh of heated area become coarse again. NDF also fluctuated. Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 4089. Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 4072. Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3476. Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 2822. Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3176. Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3344. Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3164. Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3358. Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3417. Number of degrees of freedom solved for: 3188. I work on 4.2.0.228

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content