Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Size of PML for acoustics

Posted 20 janv. 2022, 13:15 UTC−5 Acoustics & Vibrations, Mesh Version 6.0 3 Replies

Advitya Patyal
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi I am trying to solve an acoustic structure interaction model. I am following the tonpilz transducer example from the COMSOL library to set up my case. I am not sure about the size of the PML region. If I doing a frequency sweep, should I set it up as one wavelength thick? Problem is my device of interest is 10010010 mm size and the maximum frequency of interest is 1 kHz which gives a wavelength is air of 0.2 mm. This will create an unrealistically larger PML.

Is that correct? And if so, any recommendations on number of elements to be put in the PML?

3 Replies Last Post 8 mars 2022, 14:28 UTC−5
Advitya Patyal
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 20 janv. 2022, 13:26 UTC−5

Apologies, I noticed the size of the device did not show up correctly. Its 100 mm by 100 mm by 10 mm.

Apologies, I noticed the size of the device did not show up correctly. Its 100 mm by 100 mm by 10 mm.
Acculution ApS Certified Consultant
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 31 janv. 2022, 02:00 UTC−5

The actual thickness of the PML layer is not important as stated here (https://doc.comsol.com/5.5/doc/com.comsol.help.aco/aco_ug_pressure.05.106.html). Try and get some regular elements though, and at least a couple of them in the thickness direction.

-------------------
René Christensen, PhD
Acculution ApS
www.acculution.com
info@acculution.com
The actual thickness of the PML layer is not important as stated here (https://doc.comsol.com/5.5/doc/com.comsol.help.aco/aco_ug_pressure.05.106.html). Try and get some regular elements though, and at least a couple of them in the thickness direction.
Advitya Patyal
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 8 mars 2022, 14:28 UTC−5

Hi Rene I just saw this, so thank you for the pointing it out. I realized that for the frequency sweep (though simulation wise i see some minor differences, maybe due to mesh convergence?) Anyways, my primary interest is in running time dependant simulations and the guide is not so helpful in that manner apart from saying that "it matters". So, is there any guideline here apart from just trying different sizes? Should it be a factor of the frequenct of interest like 1 wavelength thick?

Hi Rene I just saw this, so thank you for the pointing it out. I realized that for the frequency sweep (though simulation wise i see some minor differences, maybe due to mesh convergence?) Anyways, my primary interest is in running time dependant simulations and the guide is not so helpful in that manner apart from saying that "it matters". So, is there any guideline here apart from just trying different sizes? Should it be a factor of the frequenct of interest like 1 wavelength thick?

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content