Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

first Eigenmode not found

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi everyone, I have problem in evaluating the eigenfrequency of a sinmple cantilever (one side fixed). I suppose to have problem in building a good mesh, the beam is composed of different layer with differend thikness (min thick: 0.2um, max thick:50um). When I use the eigenfrequency mode, the solution doesn t show the first eighenmode, which I evaluated experimenatlly. Can anyone help me to solve this issue? I can shear the file ... Thank you very much


6 Replies Last Post 23 août 2020, 12:33 UTC−4
Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 10 août 2020, 03:56 UTC−4

One possibility is that the input Search for eigenfrequencies around has a value that is far from the expected values.

-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
One possibility is that the input *Search for eigenfrequencies around* has a value that is far from the expected values.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 10 août 2020, 12:02 UTC−4

Thank you very much Henrik for your kind reply. I inserted the "eigenfrequencies around value" that I expected because i experimentally evaluated. But it seems to doesn t work. does it is possible, according your experience, that itis caused by the bad mesh? Or there is something I miss? Thank you very much for the help.

Thank you very much Henrik for your kind reply. I inserted the "eigenfrequencies around value" that I expected because i experimentally evaluated. But it seems to doesn t work. does it is possible, according your experience, that itis caused by the bad mesh? Or there is something I miss? Thank you very much for the help.

Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 11 août 2020, 17:56 UTC−4

Usually, eigenvalues and corresponding modes (at least the lower ones) are not that sensitive to the mesh, so I doubt that the mesh quality is the culprit here. Can there be a difference betwen the real world boundary conditions, and those in the FE model?

Have you measured more than one natural frequnecy, and if so, do the others match?

-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
Usually, eigenvalues and corresponding modes (at least the lower ones) are not that sensitive to the mesh, so I doubt that the mesh quality is the culprit here. Can there be a difference betwen the real world boundary conditions, and those in the FE model? Have you measured more than one natural frequnecy, and if so, do the others match?

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 23 août 2020, 12:00 UTC−4

Hi Henrik and thank you very much for your replay. Unfortunatelly, I have experimentally evaluated only the first one because I was interested in the "lower" frequency response of the sensor and, actually I am can not do further measurements. Probably you are right, the èroblem is in the boundary conditions. Actually, the structure is very simple, it is a cantilever with a fixed end and the rest free to move. There is a piezo layer betwen two other layer to constitute the sandwich structure, I did not used particular boundary constrain. Can you have some suggestions? Thank you very much again.

Hi Henrik and thank you very much for your replay. Unfortunatelly, I have experimentally evaluated only the first one because I was interested in the "lower" frequency response of the sensor and, actually I am can not do further measurements. Probably you are right, the èroblem is in the boundary conditions. Actually, the structure is very simple, it is a cantilever with a fixed end and the rest free to move. There is a piezo layer betwen two other layer to constitute the sandwich structure, I did not used particular boundary constrain. Can you have some suggestions? Thank you very much again.

Dave Greve Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 23 août 2020, 12:30 UTC−4

Without getting into details- that means, details about the experiment and looking at the .mph file...it is impossible to do more than make guesses. Probably a long talk with someone more experienced...who will ask lots of questions about what and how you are doing things...will eventually lead to a solution.

But...having done a lot of experiments myself, some on similar structures...I can say the following: When experiment and theory do not agree, one or both are wrong.

Without getting into details- that means, details about the experiment and looking at the .mph file...it is impossible to do more than make guesses. Probably a long talk with someone more experienced...who will ask lots of questions about what and how you are doing things...will eventually lead to a solution. But...having done a lot of experiments myself, some on similar structures...I can say the following: When experiment and theory do not agree, one or both are wrong.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 23 août 2020, 12:33 UTC−4

Yes, i agree with you Dave and, unfortunatelly I really think that I am wrong in the FE simulation!!!

Yes, i agree with you Dave and, unfortunatelly I really think that I am wrong in the FE simulation!!!

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.