Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

3D Meshing

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi

Is it necessary to make tetrahedral mesh in 3D model? Will it work if I use free triangular mesh in one surface and sweep it across the other surface. I have meshed my model in this way but I don't get any solution. I get an error message saying ' Inconsistent Initial Values'.
What may be the cause? is it the meshing?

Can anyone check my model and tell me what necessary changes could I make?

Thanks in advance!

7 Replies Last Post 10 déc. 2011, 06:02 UTC−5
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 9 déc. 2011, 13:52 UTC−5
Hi

a sweep mesh might also work, anyhow it's not the shape but the density of the mesh w.r.t relevant feature sizes and more important, dense enough to sample correctly any gradients of your dependent variables

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi a sweep mesh might also work, anyhow it's not the shape but the density of the mesh w.r.t relevant feature sizes and more important, dense enough to sample correctly any gradients of your dependent variables -- Good luck Ivar

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 9 déc. 2011, 13:54 UTC−5
Is it necessary to make tetrahedral mesh in 3D model?

No

Will it work if I use free triangular mesh in one surface and sweep it across the other surface.

Sometimes it works, not always. Depends on the geometry, symmetry, etc. Tetrahedral mesh is more general approach


What may be the cause? is it the meshing?

Might be. Try tetrahedral mesh
[QUOTE]Is it necessary to make tetrahedral mesh in 3D model? [/QUOTE] No [QUOTE]Will it work if I use free triangular mesh in one surface and sweep it across the other surface. [/QUOTE] Sometimes it works, not always. Depends on the geometry, symmetry, etc. Tetrahedral mesh is more general approach [QUOTE]What may be the cause? is it the meshing? [/QUOTE] Might be. Try tetrahedral mesh

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 9 déc. 2011, 13:58 UTC−5
Hi,

I have mesh one faces with free triangular element, and swept it across the other faces. When I start computing, in the message window it displays about the degrees of freedom to be solved. and then there is nothing. I see no convergence plot or any other default plot. I just get the message which says that the solution could not be converged.

Hi, I have mesh one faces with free triangular element, and swept it across the other faces. When I start computing, in the message window it displays about the degrees of freedom to be solved. and then there is nothing. I see no convergence plot or any other default plot. I just get the message which says that the solution could not be converged.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 9 déc. 2011, 14:03 UTC−5
HI Alexander,

Thanx for the wise reply. The problem with tetrahedral mesh is, whenever I build a tetrahedral mesh, there is an error shown in some boundaries. The error message is 'failed to respect a boundary edge'. And when I zoom into that boundary, I see a small line (or protude) that comes from no where.

May be there's a problem with the geometry!
HI Alexander, Thanx for the wise reply. The problem with tetrahedral mesh is, whenever I build a tetrahedral mesh, there is an error shown in some boundaries. The error message is 'failed to respect a boundary edge'. And when I zoom into that boundary, I see a small line (or protude) that comes from no where. May be there's a problem with the geometry!

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 9 déc. 2011, 19:14 UTC−5
Hi,

Try meshing the problematic boundaries with triangular mesh first.
Hi, Try meshing the problematic boundaries with triangular mesh first.

Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 10 déc. 2011, 03:51 UTC−5
Hi

Our geometrical models, if received from a CAD designer engineer, have mostly a lot of "small" mechanically useful details, but that have no FEM analysis use. Rather the contrary, most fillets, champfers, screw holes, threads etc are only a complication that can easily multiply the DoF by an order of magnitude.
Good practice is to remove these from the CAD BEFORE exporting the geometry. I do not know if this applies to your geometry, but take a closer look ;)

The difficulty is to decide what is of FEM importanceand what can be left out, this you gain only by experience, by trying out and studying intensely your results

Another issue is complex geoemtries that "loop around" as a thorus, this kind of topology often gives difficulties to the mesher as it starts somewhere then propagates as a wave, but then suddenly must match the present wave to a fixed meshe once closing the loop. Such geoemtries are often easier meshed by cutting them up, or by meshing from interiour to exteriour, or sweeping along the axis, hence some manual tweaking. Again, meshing is for me more an ar than a pure science, here again your gain time with increased experience. Often it's worth to remsh a couple of times a geometry, just to learn how it's done quickest, and what are the final quality, use the tooften overlooked "Mesh statistics" to help you "measure"

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi Our geometrical models, if received from a CAD designer engineer, have mostly a lot of "small" mechanically useful details, but that have no FEM analysis use. Rather the contrary, most fillets, champfers, screw holes, threads etc are only a complication that can easily multiply the DoF by an order of magnitude. Good practice is to remove these from the CAD BEFORE exporting the geometry. I do not know if this applies to your geometry, but take a closer look ;) The difficulty is to decide what is of FEM importanceand what can be left out, this you gain only by experience, by trying out and studying intensely your results Another issue is complex geoemtries that "loop around" as a thorus, this kind of topology often gives difficulties to the mesher as it starts somewhere then propagates as a wave, but then suddenly must match the present wave to a fixed meshe once closing the loop. Such geoemtries are often easier meshed by cutting them up, or by meshing from interiour to exteriour, or sweeping along the axis, hence some manual tweaking. Again, meshing is for me more an ar than a pure science, here again your gain time with increased experience. Often it's worth to remsh a couple of times a geometry, just to learn how it's done quickest, and what are the final quality, use the tooften overlooked "Mesh statistics" to help you "measure" -- Good luck Ivar

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 10 déc. 2011, 06:02 UTC−5
Hi Ivar

Thank you so much for the explanation. I have tried remeshing several times, but the problem when I compute, there is no progress at all, and after an hour or so, it says that it could not be converged.
However, I'll try to remesh the geometry again! ;)

Also, I will be thankful to you if you look at this another problem of mine. It is about 2D rotationary modelling.

www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/24687/


Thank you Again! :)
Hi Ivar Thank you so much for the explanation. I have tried remeshing several times, but the problem when I compute, there is no progress at all, and after an hour or so, it says that it could not be converged. However, I'll try to remesh the geometry again! ;) Also, I will be thankful to you if you look at this another problem of mine. It is about 2D rotationary modelling. http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/24687/ Thank you Again! :)

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.