Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Heating inside microwave oven

Posted 23 déc. 2010, 17:27 UTC−5 RF & Microwave Engineering Version 4.0, Version 4.2 3 Replies

Iman Hassaballa
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Dear Sir
I'm trying to model the electromagnetic field distribution inside microwave oven used to heat a small specimen inside a container. I've survyed your example of heating a potato inside the cavity of microwave oven, but I couldn't understand making the mesh vector cubic, quadratic & linear using geometric multigrid. Also, about free mesh, why setting the maximum element size to 0.049/sqrt(dielectric constant)?
Does changing the location of th waveguide have an effect on the equation of the electric field you used? and if so, how can i formulate the suitable port equation for my model.

Thanks a lot,
Awaiting your kindly reply,
Iman Hassaballa
3 Replies Last Post 14 sept. 2011, 11:48 UTC−4
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 24 déc. 2010, 04:28 UTC−5
Hi

if you are in RF or ACDC you must check that you have enough mesh elements inside a wavelength to resolve correctly the field, and as the wavelength changes with the index of refraction, or the dielectric constant, one way is to impos that the maximum mesh size is related to these variables.

In the example then main reason is to have a coarse mesh to be able to solve it on a laptop, but to ensure that is adapted everywhere, hence the dependency on "1/n" wich is proportional to 1/sqrt(dielectric_constant). You could as well use 0.01/sqrt(dielectric constant) if you have enough RAM, but overdoing it just requires more time without a significant increase in correctness of the result

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi if you are in RF or ACDC you must check that you have enough mesh elements inside a wavelength to resolve correctly the field, and as the wavelength changes with the index of refraction, or the dielectric constant, one way is to impos that the maximum mesh size is related to these variables. In the example then main reason is to have a coarse mesh to be able to solve it on a laptop, but to ensure that is adapted everywhere, hence the dependency on "1/n" wich is proportional to 1/sqrt(dielectric_constant). You could as well use 0.01/sqrt(dielectric constant) if you have enough RAM, but overdoing it just requires more time without a significant increase in correctness of the result -- Good luck Ivar
Iman Hassaballa
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 27 déc. 2010, 14:13 UTC−5
Hi,

Thanks a lot for your reply. I have another question concerning the equation of the waveguide port. As shown in the example of the microwave oven, there is a rectangular waveguide operating in TE10 mode having power of 1KW. I have two concerns: regarding the power, it is diminished to half its value in port tab to be 500W instead. Second, I can't understand the equation of the Eo having the value cos(pi*(y-13.5[cm])/7.8[cm]) in the Z direction. What does 13.5 come from? and if I changed the location of the waveguide, what parameters would change in the equation?

Awaiting your kindly reply,
Iman Hassaballa

Hi, Thanks a lot for your reply. I have another question concerning the equation of the waveguide port. As shown in the example of the microwave oven, there is a rectangular waveguide operating in TE10 mode having power of 1KW. I have two concerns: regarding the power, it is diminished to half its value in port tab to be 500W instead. Second, I can't understand the equation of the Eo having the value cos(pi*(y-13.5[cm])/7.8[cm]) in the Z direction. What does 13.5 come from? and if I changed the location of the waveguide, what parameters would change in the equation? Awaiting your kindly reply, Iman Hassaballa
SOhan
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 14 sept. 2011, 11:48 UTC−4
The example in model library was meant for running the model on low end laptops. If you have good computer you can use whole Microwave oven and put full rectangular wave guide piece and simply assign TE10 mode on rectangular section cross section. In this case you do not need to E field expression. However, this approach is just good for understanding the interaction of microwave with the materials. For actual simulation, one has to take into account of actual wave-guide port as we see in the domestic microwave oven and use magnetron as coaxial source.

With best,
Sohan Birla,
The example in model library was meant for running the model on low end laptops. If you have good computer you can use whole Microwave oven and put full rectangular wave guide piece and simply assign TE10 mode on rectangular section cross section. In this case you do not need to E field expression. However, this approach is just good for understanding the interaction of microwave with the materials. For actual simulation, one has to take into account of actual wave-guide port as we see in the domestic microwave oven and use magnetron as coaxial source. With best, Sohan Birla,

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content