Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                7 years ago                            
                            
                                17 juin 2018, 04:10 UTC−4                            
                        
                        
                                                    I think you should try first given examples in RF module to understand basics and then try yours own model.
                                                 
                                                
                            I think you should try first given examples in RF module to understand basics and then try yours own model.                        
                                                
                                                                                                            
                                             
                                            
                                                
    
        Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                7 years ago                            
                            
                                5 juil. 2018, 23:58 UTC−4                            
                        
                        
                                                    Hi José,
I would not try a user-defined port first. It mostly depends on your structure, for example a rectangle in 2D is a simplified model for a rectangular waveguide. Hence, if the field goes to 0 immediatly, I would think that this is because you are sending a mode that cannot propagate into your rectangle.
You can try a numeric port, but if you want to be more specific, I would go first for a rectangular port, using a TE10 mode, or a TM11 modes (they have the lowest cutoff frequencies in a rectangular waveguide). Hence, you are not obliged to specify the components of E.
Another solution might be that you are propagating at the wrong frequency. Because your waveguide is finite, I would do an eigenmode study first, then pick a good frequency (lowest imaginary part and which looks like a TE or TM or whatever mode you are sending), and then do the Frequency domain study with this frequency as an input. That will ensure you that this frequency is allowed to propagate.
I don't know if you did but don't forget so specify a Boundary Mode Analysis in your study, not for the eigenfrequency study but before the Frequency domain step in the other study.
About the boundary conditions, a PEC is appropriate as long as your are propagating in a metal : it will reflect everything. Otherwise, if it is not a metal, I would put the structure in a box of air, with scattering boundary conditions on the sides to absorb the field (and add PML around if you want).
Attached is a TE10 mode propagating in a semiconducture waveguide, surrounding by air and with PML to give you an example. I did it in 3D.
Best,
François Swiadek
                                                 
                                                
                            Hi José, 
I would not try a user-defined port first. It mostly depends on your structure, for example a rectangle in 2D is a simplified model for a rectangular waveguide. Hence, if the field goes to 0 immediatly, I would think that this is because you are sending a mode that cannot propagate into your rectangle. 
You can try a numeric port, but if you want to be more specific, I would go first for a rectangular port, using a TE10 mode, or a TM11 modes (they have the lowest cutoff frequencies in a rectangular waveguide). Hence, you are not obliged to specify the components of E. 
Another solution might be that you are propagating at the wrong frequency. Because your waveguide is finite, I would do an eigenmode study first, then pick a good frequency (lowest imaginary part and which looks like a TE or TM or whatever mode you are sending), and then do the Frequency domain study with this frequency as an input. That will ensure you that this frequency is allowed to propagate.
I don't know if you did but don't forget so specify a Boundary Mode Analysis in your study, not for the eigenfrequency study but before the Frequency domain step in the other study. 
About the boundary conditions, a PEC is appropriate as long as your are propagating in a metal : it will reflect everything. Otherwise, if it is not a metal, I would put the structure in a box of air, with scattering boundary conditions on the sides to absorb the field (and add PML around if you want). 
Attached is a TE10 mode propagating in a semiconducture waveguide, surrounding by air and with PML to give you an example. I did it in 3D.
Best, 
François Swiadek
                        
                                                
                        
                                                
                                                                                                            
                                             
                        
                        
                            
                                                                                        
                                Robert Koslover
                                                                                                                                                    Certified Consultant
                                                         
                            
                         
                                                
    
        Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                7 years ago                            
                            
                                11 juil. 2018, 13:25 UTC−4                            
                        
                        Updated:
                            
                                7 years ago                            
                            
                                11 juil. 2018, 13:27 UTC−4                            
                        
                        
                                                    If you want to generate/apply an open-space plane wave, consider using the scattered wave formulation (a background wave) instead of attempting to launch a plane wave from a port.  And, in that case, don't use PECs for the boundary conditions anywhere that they wouldn't already be a perfect fit to the plane wave in question.
    -------------------
    Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara                                                 
                                                
                            If you want to generate/apply an open-space plane wave, consider using the scattered wave formulation (a background wave) instead of attempting to launch a plane wave from a port.  And, in that case, don't use PECs for the boundary conditions anywhere that they wouldn't already be a perfect fit to the plane wave in question.