Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Modal assurance criterion (MAC) calculation

Posted 21 mars 2019, 01:08 UTC−4 Structural & Acoustics, Acoustics & Vibrations Version 5.4 3 Replies

Panson Poon
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Does COMSOL calculate MAC of mode shapes obtained by FEA and mode shapes derived from experimental modal analysis (EMA)?

Is there a command for MAC?

Thank you!

3 Replies Last Post 21 mars 2019, 06:13 UTC−4
Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 7 years ago 21 mars 2019, 03:46 UTC−4

Hi Panson,

There is no built-in MAC functionality. You can however compute an index by using the built-in integration operators and integrate a normalized inner product between two modes. For two modes computed inside COMSOL Multiphysics, you can use expressions like this:

intop1(withsol('sol3',u,setind(lambda,1))*withsol('sol4',u,setval(lambda,2))+ withsol('sol3',v,setind(lambda,1))*withsol('sol4',v,setval(lambda,2))+ withsol('sol3',w,setind(lambda,1))*withsol('sol4',w,setval(lambda,2)))

This expression computes the inner product between the first mode in solution 'sol3' and the second mode in the solution 'sol4', assuming that 'intop1' integrates over the whole domain and that mass matrix normalization has been used.

The crucial point if you have measured data is how to import it, so that the experimental mode shape is attached to the computational domain so that a similar integral can be computed.

Regards,
Henrik

-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
Hi Panson, There is no built-in MAC functionality. You can however compute an index by using the built-in integration operators and integrate a normalized inner product between two modes. For two modes computed inside COMSOL Multiphysics, you can use expressions like this: intop1(withsol('sol3',u,setind(lambda,1))\*withsol('sol4',u,setval(lambda,2))+ withsol('sol3',v,setind(lambda,1))\*withsol('sol4',v,setval(lambda,2))+ withsol('sol3',w,setind(lambda,1))\*withsol('sol4',w,setval(lambda,2))) This expression computes the inner product between the first mode in solution 'sol3' and the second mode in the solution 'sol4', assuming that 'intop1' integrates over the whole domain and that mass matrix normalization has been used. The crucial point if you have measured data is how to import it, so that the experimental mode shape is attached to the computational domain so that a similar integral can be computed. Regards, Henrik
Panson Poon
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 7 years ago 21 mars 2019, 03:52 UTC−4

Hi Henrik,

Thank you for your response!

Would LiveLink for MATLAB make thing easier? Mode shapes in COMSOL experted to Matlab where processes experimental data.

Cheers, Panson

Hi Henrik, Thank you for your response! Would LiveLink for MATLAB make thing easier? Mode shapes in COMSOL experted to Matlab where processes experimental data. Cheers, Panson
Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 7 years ago 21 mars 2019, 06:13 UTC−4

Hi Panson,

Yes, LiveLink for MATLAB can be useful here.

Using a Model Method could be another alternative.

Regards,
Henrik

-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
Hi Panson, Yes, LiveLink for MATLAB can be useful here. Using a Model Method could be another alternative. Regards, Henrik

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content