Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Magnetic Field in Axisymmetric Model

Posted 11 nov. 2019, 11:06 UTC−5 Low-Frequency Electromagnetics Version 5.3a 3 Replies

Kate Richardson
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello,

I am having trouble seeing the correct results from a current in a loop of wire in an axisymmetric model. I am using the Magnetic Fields physics and I've tried adding either an External Current Density and a Line Current (Out-of-Plane) and see no magnetic field in the center of the loop from either. I've attached my model, any advice?

Thanks!

Attachments:

3 Replies Last Post 12 nov. 2019, 08:32 UTC−5
Edgar J. Kaiser Certified Consultant
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 6 years ago 11 nov. 2019, 11:35 UTC−5

Kate,

this is is probably a visualisation effect. The flux density close to the very thin wire or the line current is by orders of magnitude higher than in the rest of the air domain. So the scaling is not really appropriate to see details of the field. You can plot log10(mf.normB) to see what I mean. I also saw that you are setting µr for the water domain very close to zero where it should be 1?

Cheers Edgar

-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Kate, this is is probably a visualisation effect. The flux density close to the very thin wire or the line current is by orders of magnitude higher than in the rest of the air domain. So the scaling is not really appropriate to see details of the field. You can plot log10(mf.normB) to see what I mean. I also saw that you are setting µr for the water domain very close to zero where it should be 1? Cheers Edgar
Kate Richardson
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 6 years ago 11 nov. 2019, 13:45 UTC−5
Updated: 6 years ago 11 nov. 2019, 08:45 UTC−5

Thanks, Edgar! Adding the log10 makes it a lot more clear. I was trying to simulate salt water instead of fresh water, but my university does not own a liscence to the Corrosion module so it is not a built in material. I found that value in a paper, but I will switch it to 1.

Thanks, Edgar! Adding the log10 makes it a lot more clear. I was trying to simulate salt water instead of fresh water, but my university does not own a liscence to the Corrosion module so it is not a built in material. I found that value in a paper, but I will switch it to 1.
Edgar J. Kaiser Certified Consultant
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 6 years ago 12 nov. 2019, 08:32 UTC−5

Hi Kate,

you probably found the magnetic susceptibility which is often used for paramagnetic or diamagnetic materials:

Good luck, Edgar

-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Hi Kate, you probably found the magnetic susceptibility which is often used for paramagnetic or diamagnetic materials: \chi = \mu_r - 1 Good luck, Edgar

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content