Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Simulating THz in the RF module
Posted 8 mars 2024, 08:43 UTC−5 RF & Microwave Engineering, Geometry, Mesh Version 5.6 4 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi All,
I am currently trying to simulate a feed horn at terahertz frequencies and eventually encorporate the feedhorn design in to a cassegrain antenna. My current issue is that I will run out of memory either at the meshing stage or during the computational stage. Since my design is not cylindrically simetrical, I am restricted to a 3D environment. The design is 4-fold symetric so I am able to take advantage of applying PEC and PMC boundary conditions, but the load is still to large for the memory available. Is there something else I could try to overcome this issue?
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Well, if you haven't already: 1. Carefully adjust your mesh to include no more detail than necessary. 2. Restrict your computational space to no larger than necessary. 3. Use linear discretization. 4. Use the GMRES iterative solver with SOR vector preconditioner. (Slow, but memory efficient and generally gets the job done, eventually.) However, none of the above is likely to be adequate if your dish antenna is sufficiently large (e.g., 40 dB or more of gain), especially if you don't have hundreds of GB of RAM and up to days of computational time available, or need to run many frequencies. In that case, you may need to employ an alternative or hybrid computational approach. If you can share more about your problem, you may be able to get more specific advice here.
-------------------Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi Robert,
Attached is my current design of a diagonal horn (no dish included in the simulation).
Best, Daniel Heligman
Attachments:
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I also, do not seem to have the GMRES solver as an option. Only MUMPS, PARDISO, SPOOLES, and Dense matrix.
Best, Daniel Heligman
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Use a manually-configured mesh. In the Model Builder, right-click Mesh, then Free Tetrahedral. Right click Free Tetrahedral 1, then size. In the Settings pane, choose specific geometric entities and specify sizes appropriate to the calculation. You can set sizes in domains, on boundaries, edges, and points, with separate size entries. You will also probably want to define a swept mesh for your PML layer. The simple Port 1 setting of TE10 isn't going to work with your PMC boundary. Instead, set that port so as to provide fields appropriate to 1/4th of the (full, virtual) physical waveguide there. Unfortunately, setting the PMC and PEC boundaries doesn't do this automatically. There are other ways to configure ports, so I encourage you to think about it. To set the solver to GMRES (if needed), in the Model Builder, expand Study --> Solver Configurations --> Solution 1 --> Stationary Solver 1, then right click Stationary Solver 1 and choose Iterative. Then you can choose among various solvers in the Settings pane.
-------------------Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara