Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

"No frame is defined for 0D applications"

Posted 22 févr. 2013, 06:58 UTC−5 Version 4.3, Version 4.3a 8 Replies

Asli Calis
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello again.

I am trying to simulate an E-core transformer. When I click the study 1 and select the show default solver there is an error occurs "No frame is defined for 0D applications" . What is it mean?

Thanks

Asli
8 Replies Last Post 7 avr. 2016, 08:43 UTC−4
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 22 févr. 2013, 07:26 UTC−5
Hi

are you sure you selected "3D" or "2D" when starting your model ?

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi are you sure you selected "3D" or "2D" when starting your model ? -- Good luck Ivar
Asli Calis
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 22 févr. 2013, 09:58 UTC−5
Hello,

Yes, of course I'm sure I selected 3D . I don't understand why the program gives this error :(
When I changed the electrical circuit node's parameters (for example resistor, external I vs U. parameters (i.e p:3 n is empty) etc. ) this time program gives an another error such as "The DAE is structurally inconsistent. Variables:2 Equations:1 Error in automatic sequence generation"

I appreciate you can give me some suggestion

Regards

Asli
Hello, Yes, of course I'm sure I selected 3D . I don't understand why the program gives this error :( When I changed the electrical circuit node's parameters (for example resistor, external I vs U. parameters (i.e p:3 n is empty) etc. ) this time program gives an another error such as "The DAE is structurally inconsistent. Variables:2 Equations:1 Error in automatic sequence generation" I appreciate you can give me some suggestion Regards Asli
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 22 févr. 2013, 13:16 UTC−5
Hi

it's rue CIRis 0D "physics" so it's therein, you need to have a logical circuit without tangling items, check again your id numers, and note these re different (not linked) to the Terminal number id's

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi it's rue CIRis 0D "physics" so it's therein, you need to have a logical circuit without tangling items, check again your id numers, and note these re different (not linked) to the Terminal number id's -- Good luck Ivar
Asli Calis
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 24 févr. 2013, 04:28 UTC−5
Hello Mr. Ivar,

What are the means of the terminal numbers and id numbers? Can you give me an example? I can not found the solution :(

My elecrical circuit (cir) parameters are:

Groung node 1: Connected to node 0

Voltage Source: p:1 n:0

External I Vs. U 1 : p:2 n:1

Resistor 1 : p:0 n:2

External I Vs. U 2 : p:3 n:0

Resistor 2: p:0 n:3
Hello Mr. Ivar, What are the means of the terminal numbers and id numbers? Can you give me an example? I can not found the solution :( My elecrical circuit (cir) parameters are: Groung node 1: Connected to node 0 Voltage Source: p:1 n:0 External I Vs. U 1 : p:2 n:1 Resistor 1 : p:0 n:2 External I Vs. U 2 : p:3 n:0 Resistor 2: p:0 n:3
Laura McDonnell
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 13 mai 2013, 06:57 UTC−4
Hello,

I am having the exact same issue attempting to model an E-Core transformer. Has anyone found out what the problem was?
Hello, I am having the exact same issue attempting to model an E-Core transformer. Has anyone found out what the problem was?
Neil Veira
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 2 juil. 2013, 13:14 UTC−4
Were you using the time domain, as in the example model? I was also having this problem, and I discovered that switching from frequency domain to time domain fixed it.
Were you using the time domain, as in the example model? I was also having this problem, and I discovered that switching from frequency domain to time domain fixed it.
Jeon Jiyun
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 28 nov. 2013, 09:10 UTC−5
Do you mean model in this site?
I had same problem.
First, I only solve with time dependent study.
It was solved. And then, I added coil calculation. It worked.
Do you mean model in this site? I had same problem. First, I only solve with time dependent study. It was solved. And then, I added coil calculation. It worked.
开洲 焦
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 10 years ago 7 avr. 2016, 08:43 UTC−4
hello,I have the same problem,but I find the solution method .Maybe you circuit source is wrong ,and you can change it.
hello,I have the same problem,but I find the solution method .Maybe you circuit source is wrong ,and you can change it.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content